For agencies

Your clients are already asking about ChatGPT. Have an answer with evidence behind it.

Add AI search visibility reporting to your existing retainers without building the measurement infrastructure, the provider integrations, or the argument about what the numbers mean.

Founding pilot pricing while we validate. 14-day pilot, founder-run, cancel any time.

What lands in the client review

Illustrative example
ChatGPT Competitor A recommended “Best [category] for enterprise”
Gemini client named, not recommended Mentioned only
Perplexity Competitor A recommended Competitor wins

Plus: the sources those answers drew on, the competitors named instead of your client, and one prioritised action with its evidence attached.

Shaped to show the deliverable structure. The only measured numbers we publish are from our own founder-owned brand.

The conversation this is for

A client asks why they do not come up in ChatGPT. Right now the honest answers are either "we do not know" or a screenshot of one person's chat session. Neither is a deliverable, and neither justifies a line on an invoice.

What we produce is a per-client report showing which buying questions an AI assistant answers with a competitor, which sources those answers drew on, and what the evidence points to next. That is something you can put in a monthly review, and something a follow-on scope of work can be built from.

Why agencies, first

Straight answer: one agency relationship covers several brands, agencies already run recurring reporting, and agencies can turn a finding into paid work. That makes agencies the fastest place for us to learn whether this is worth paying for. It is a hypothesis about our business, and we are telling you it is one.

How a client brand moves through the pilot

Per-client workflow

Planned — not built

1 · Question set

10–20 buyer questions built from the client’s category, ICP and named competitors.

2 · Your approval

You sign off the question list before anything is measured. No provider spend happens behind your back.

3 · Measurement

All three engines, reported separately, failed calls excluded from denominators.

4 · Review

A founder reads the report before you do. During the pilot that is a person, not a pipeline.

5 · Deliverable

A report file you can take into a monthly review, plus a strategy walkthrough call.

6 · Remeasure

The same questions again after the work, under a compatible protocol — or an explicit refusal to compare if the protocol moved.

Labelled planned-preview because there is no agency workspace to log into. Steps 1–6 happen today; they happen because a person runs them.

What the Founding Agency Pilot includes

Up to 3 client brands

Each with 10–20 buyer questions built from their category, ICP and named competitors.

All three engines

ChatGPT via OpenAI API, Gemini with Google Search grounding, Perplexity.

Per-client report

Recommendation status, citation evidence, competitors named instead, prioritised findings.

Founder-reviewed

We read every report before you get it. During the pilot that is a person, not a pipeline.

Strategy walkthrough

A call to go through the findings and what they do and do not support.

14 days

Long enough to take the report to a client, short enough that you are not stuck with us.

What you are not getting yet

  • No client login or self-service dashboard. Reports are files.
  • No white-label. Our methodology section stays on the report.
  • No automated schedule. Re-runs happen because we run them.
  • No API, no integrations, no SSO.

Founding pilot pricing exists because of that list, not despite it.

What we are still proving. That buyer-intent prioritisation beats generic visibility tracking is our working hypothesis, not a settled finding. We think measuring the questions that precede a purchase is more useful than counting mentions across a large prompt list — but we are testing that with paying customers, not asserting it. We have no customer results yet, and we will not invent any.

What to read before you buy

The deliverable is described section by section on what a useful AI visibility report contains. The recurring workflow behind a retainer is on AI search monitoring, and the brand-representation view your clients will ask about is on AI brand monitoring. If you are still comparing vendors, we published where we lose.

Common questions

Can I white-label the report?

Not yet. Reports carry our methodology section, and you are free to present them to clients as work you commissioned. A white-label build follows paying demand, not the other way round.

How many client brands are in the pilot?

Up to three, with 10 to 20 buyer questions each, across all three engines.

Do you work with our clients directly?

Only if you ask us to. By default we work with you and you own the client relationship.

What if my client asks whether this is the real ChatGPT?

Tell them the truth, and the report already does: it is the official OpenAI API with web search enabled, not a logged-in consumer session. That answer holds up better than a vague one.

What we actually measure

Every result comes from the official OpenAI, Google Gemini and Perplexity APIs with web search or grounding enabled. In our data those surfaces are recorded as openai_api_web_search, gemini_api_google_search and perplexity_api_sonar, and reports name them explicitly.

That is not the same thing as a logged-in person using the ChatGPT app. These are official interfaces with web search on, but they are measurement surfaces rather than consumer sessions: no personalisation, no memory, no app-only features. Results can differ from what any individual user sees, and we do not claim the two are identical. We would rather put that on the pricing page than in the small print.

Take one client brand and find out.

Three client brands, all three engines, founder-reviewed. If the run finds nothing worth acting on for a brand, the report says that instead of manufacturing a finding.

US$499/month while we validate. Up to 3 client brands. Cancel any time.